Whether or not belongings held inside a belief grow to be a part of the marital property throughout divorce proceedings is determined by quite a lot of components. Usually, trusts created earlier than the wedding, and funded with separate property, are sometimes thought of non-marital. Nevertheless, trusts established through the marriage, or these funded with marital belongings, could also be topic to division. For instance, a belief established and funded by one partner earlier than the wedding, containing an inheritance, may stay separate property. Conversely, if marital funds are used to keep up or improve a premarital belief, a portion of its worth could possibly be deemed marital property.
Clarifying the marital or non-marital standing of a belief is essential throughout divorce proceedings. This willpower impacts the equitable distribution of belongings between spouses. Traditionally, trusts have supplied a mechanism for managing and defending wealth, generally throughout generations. Understanding how this interacts with fashionable divorce regulation ensures truthful and acceptable outcomes. Misunderstandings can result in protracted authorized battles and probably inequitable settlements.
The next sections delve deeper into the nuances of this subject, exploring the varieties of trusts, the impression of jurisdiction, and the position of pre- and post-nuptial agreements in figuring out how these belongings are handled in divorce.
1. Jurisdictional Variations
State legal guidelines considerably affect whether or not a belief is taken into account marital property throughout divorce proceedings. These jurisdictional variations create complexity in figuring out how belief belongings are categorized and distributed. Some states adhere to “neighborhood property” legal guidelines, usually presuming that belongings acquired through the marriage belong equally to each spouses. In these jurisdictions, trusts created through the marriage, even when solely funded by one partner, is likely to be deemed neighborhood property topic to division. Different states observe “equitable distribution” rules, specializing in a good, although not essentially equal, division of belongings. In such jurisdictions, courts look at numerous components, together with the supply of belief funds, the intent behind the belief’s creation, and the spouses’ contributions to the wedding, to find out what portion, if any, of a belief constitutes marital property.
For instance, in a neighborhood property state, a belief established and funded by one partner through the marriage, even for property planning functions, is likely to be considered otherwise than in an equitable distribution state. The latter may think about the intent behind the belief’s creation and whether or not it primarily benefited one partner over the opposite. Conversely, a belief established earlier than the wedding, containing an inheritance, is likely to be handled equally in each varieties of jurisdictions, usually remaining separate property except commingled with marital belongings. These variations underscore the importance of understanding relevant state legal guidelines when contemplating the position of trusts in divorce.
Navigating these jurisdictional complexities requires authorized experience. Consulting with an lawyer specializing in household regulation and belief administration inside the related jurisdiction is essential. Such experience ensures acceptable methods for safeguarding belongings and attaining equitable outcomes in divorce proceedings involving trusts. Failure to contemplate jurisdictional variations can result in surprising and probably unfavorable outcomes.
2. Belief Creation Timing
Belief creation timing performs a pivotal position in figuring out whether or not a belief is taken into account marital property in divorce proceedings. A belief established earlier than the wedding, sometimes called a premarital belief, is usually considered as separate property, notably if funded with premarital belongings like inheritances or earnings. For instance, if one partner established a belief earlier than the wedding and funded it with an inheritance acquired previous to the wedding, that belief, and the belongings inside it, would possible be thought of separate property and never topic to division throughout divorce. Nevertheless, if, after the wedding, marital funds are used to contribute to or improve the premarital belief, these contributions, and probably any appreciation attributable to them, could possibly be deemed marital property.
Conversely, trusts created through the marriage, generally known as inter-vivos or residing trusts, usually tend to be thought of marital property, particularly if funded with marital belongings. This holds true even when the belief is established and funded solely by one partner. For example, if through the marriage, one partner units up a residing belief and funds it with earnings earned through the marriage, that belief, no matter titling, would usually be thought of marital property topic to division. It’s because belongings acquired through the marriage are sometimes thought of marital property, no matter how they’re held. Nevertheless, even with trusts created through the marriage, the supply of funds stays an important issue. If a belief is established through the marriage however funded solely with an inheritance acquired by one partner through the marriage, it is likely to be thought of separate property. The precise info and circumstances surrounding the belief’s creation and funding are vital.
Understanding the timing of belief creation, together with the supply of its funding, is subsequently important for each spouses. This data permits for proactive planning and administration of belongings, each through the marriage and in anticipation of potential divorce. Failure to understand the implications of belief creation timing can result in unintended penalties concerning asset division. Consulting with a authorized skilled specializing in household regulation and property planning is essential for navigating these complexities and making certain acceptable asset safety methods are applied.
3. Supply of Belief Funds
The origin of belongings used to fund a belief considerably impacts whether or not the belief, or parts thereof, is taken into account marital property in divorce proceedings. Tracing the supply of funds is essential for figuring out how a belief is handled throughout asset division. Completely different sources can result in distinct classifications, affecting the ultimate distribution of belongings.
-
Premarital Property
Funds originating from belongings owned earlier than the wedding, akin to inheritances, items acquired previous to the wedding, or proceeds from the sale of premarital property, usually retain their separate property standing even when positioned right into a belief. For example, if one partner inherited a sum of cash earlier than the wedding and subsequently positioned these funds right into a belief, the belief would usually be thought of separate property, shielded from division. Nevertheless, the characterization can change if marital funds are commingled with the premarital belongings inside the belief.
-
Marital Property
Trusts funded with belongings acquired through the marriage, like earnings earned through the marriage, funding returns on joint accounts, or proceeds from the sale of marital property, are sometimes thought of marital property, even when the belief is established and managed by just one partner. Depositing a portion of joint earnings right into a belief through the marriage doesn’t change its marital nature. This holds true whatever the titling of the belief or the intent behind its creation.
-
Commingled Property
When funds from separate and marital sources are combined inside a belief, complexities come up. Courts could try and hint the contributions and apportion the belief belongings accordingly. For instance, if a premarital belief funded with an inheritance subsequently receives contributions from marital earnings, a portion of the belief is likely to be thought of marital property, reflecting the commingled marital contributions and any appreciation attributed to them. Demonstrating the origin of funds by means of meticulous record-keeping turns into paramount in such eventualities.
-
Items and Inheritances Acquired Throughout Marriage
Items or inheritances acquired by one partner through the marriage, whereas usually thought of separate property, can grow to be sophisticated when positioned right into a belief. If the reward or inheritance is deposited right into a belief solely for the advantage of the receiving partner, it’s more likely to retain its separate character. Nevertheless, if the belief advantages each spouses or if marital funds are commingled, the strains can blur, probably exposing a portion of the belief to division in a divorce.
Understanding the supply of belief funds is paramount when analyzing how a belief is likely to be handled in divorce proceedings. This, coupled with components like jurisdiction and the timing of belief creation, gives a complete view of how belief belongings is likely to be categorized and probably divided. Overlooking the significance of tracing the supply of funds can have important implications on the equitable distribution of belongings throughout divorce.
4. Partner’s Management Over Belief
The diploma of management a partner workouts over a belief can considerably affect whether or not a belief, or a portion thereof, is deemed marital property in divorce proceedings. Whereas not solely determinative, the extent of management serves as an important issue courts think about when assessing the character of belief belongings. Substantial management, particularly when coupled with using belief belongings for marital functions, can enhance the chance of a belief, or a portion of it, being labeled as marital property topic to division.
For example, if a partner serves as the only trustee of a belief, possesses unrestricted energy to distribute belief earnings or principal, and makes use of belief funds to pay household bills, a court docket may view the belief as an extension of the partner’s private funds, thereby classifying some or all of it as marital property. Conversely, if a partner is a beneficiary of a belief however has no management over distributions, with an unbiased trustee making all choices, the belief belongings are much less more likely to be thought of marital property, even when the partner receives distributions through the marriage. An additional instance includes a belief established by a 3rd occasion for a partner’s profit. Even when the partner receives distributions through the marriage, the dearth of management over the belief belongings sometimes shields them from being deemed marital property. Nevertheless, if the partner workouts oblique management, akin to influencing an amenable trustee, the evaluation turns into extra complicated, and the court docket could scrutinize the precise dynamics of the belief administration.
Understanding the interaction between spousal management and the characterization of belief belongings is essential for each spouses and property planners. Clarifying management mechanisms inside belief paperwork will help delineate separate and marital property. This readability simplifies asset division throughout divorce, probably mitigating disputes. Failure to deal with management points can create ambiguity and result in protracted authorized battles, growing prices and emotional pressure. Subsequently, looking for skilled authorized counsel specializing in household regulation and belief administration is important for establishing and managing trusts successfully, notably when contemplating potential divorce implications.
5. Belief Goal
The aim for which a belief is established is usually a related consider figuring out whether or not it constitutes marital property in divorce proceedings. Whereas not all the time dispositive, the intent behind the belief’s creation can present useful context for courts assessing how its belongings must be categorized. Completely different functions can result in variations in how a belief is handled throughout asset division, notably when thought of alongside different components such because the supply of funds and the timing of the belief’s creation.
-
Asset Safety
Trusts designed primarily to protect belongings from collectors or potential liabilities are sometimes considered as separate property, particularly if established and funded earlier than the wedding. For instance, a belief established previous to the wedding with the specific objective of defending inherited belongings from enterprise liabilities would possible be thought of separate property, even when the beneficiary partner is actively concerned within the enterprise through the marriage. Nevertheless, if such a belief had been used to protect marital belongings from collectors, it is likely to be topic to scrutiny.
-
Property Planning
Trusts created for property planning functions, akin to minimizing property taxes or managing intergenerational wealth transfers, are usually handled as separate property, particularly in the event that they predate the wedding and are funded with premarital belongings. A belief designed to distribute belongings to youngsters from a previous relationship upon the settlor’s loss of life, for instance, would possible be thought of separate property, even when established through the marriage. Nevertheless, using marital belongings to fund such a belief may complicate issues.
-
Assist for a Particular Beneficiary
Trusts established for the help of a particular beneficiary, akin to a toddler with particular wants or an aged mother or father, is likely to be thought of separate property, particularly if the beneficiary isn’t a partner. A belief arrange through the marriage to offer for the continuing care of a kid with disabilities, funded with one partner’s separate property, is much less more likely to be thought of marital property. Nevertheless, using marital funds for such a belief would introduce complexity into the evaluation.
-
Marital Profit
If a belief, no matter when it was created, is demonstrably used for the advantage of the wedding, akin to paying household bills, funding joint holidays, or buying marital property, a court docket may view the belief, or a portion thereof, as marital property, even when nominally titled in a single partner’s title. Common contributions from marital earnings to a belief used for family bills may strengthen the argument for contemplating no less than a portion of the belief as marital property.
Understanding the interaction between belief objective and its classification as marital property requires cautious consideration of the particular info and circumstances surrounding the belief’s creation and administration. Whereas the acknowledged objective gives a place to begin, courts typically look at the totality of the circumstances, together with the supply of funds, the timing of the belief’s institution, and the precise use of belief belongings, to find out whether or not a belief, or a portion thereof, must be topic to division in divorce proceedings. Subsequently, consulting with authorized counsel specializing in each household regulation and trusts is essential for making certain that the aim of the belief is clearly outlined and its administration aligns with its meant objectives, minimizing potential disputes within the occasion of divorce.
6. Pre-Nuptial Agreements
Pre-nuptial agreements play an important position in figuring out how trusts are handled in divorce proceedings. These agreements, established earlier than marriage, can outline whether or not a belief is taken into account separate or marital property, overriding default state legal guidelines. A well-drafted pre-nuptial settlement gives readability and predictability concerning the disposition of belief belongings, probably mitigating disputes throughout divorce.
-
Explicitly Addressing Trusts
Pre-nuptial agreements can explicitly categorize current or future trusts as separate or marital property. This clear designation avoids ambiguity and streamlines the asset division course of. For instance, a pre-nuptial settlement may stipulate {that a} belief established by one partner earlier than the wedding, containing inherited belongings, stays separate property, no matter any contributions made through the marriage. Conversely, the settlement may designate a belief established through the marriage, even when funded solely by one partner, as marital property topic to division.
-
Waiving Rights to Belief Property
Spouses can waive any rights or claims to one another’s trusts inside a pre-nuptial settlement. This waiver affords a transparent delineation of separate property, stopping future disputes over belief belongings. One partner may waive any future declare to a belief established by the opposite partner, even when that belief is funded with marital belongings through the marriage. Such waivers present certainty and predictability concerning asset division within the occasion of divorce.
-
Defining Commingling Guidelines
Pre-nuptial agreements can set up particular guidelines concerning commingling of separate and marital belongings inside a belief. This proactive method clarifies how commingled belongings are handled, avoiding potential disputes. An settlement may stipulate that any marital funds contributed to a premarital belief, and any appreciation attributable to these contributions, grow to be marital property topic to division. This avoids the complicated tracing workouts generally required by courts when commingling happens.
-
Full Disclosure of Belief Property
A pre-nuptial settlement requires full disclosure of all belongings, together with trusts. This transparency ensures each events enter the wedding with a transparent understanding of the monetary panorama, facilitating knowledgeable choices. Disclosing the existence, objective, and worth of all belief belongings permits each events to barter the phrases of the pre-nuptial settlement pretty and equitably. With out full disclosure, the validity of the settlement could possibly be challenged.
Pre-nuptial agreements present a strong software for managing how trusts are handled in divorce. By addressing trusts explicitly inside these agreements, {couples} can set up clear tips for asset division, minimizing potential battle and selling a extra amicable and environment friendly divorce course of. This proactive method fosters readability and predictability, in the end benefiting each events. The cautious consideration of trusts inside a pre-nuptial settlement, along side knowledgeable authorized recommendation, is important for safeguarding particular person pursuits and making certain a good and equitable consequence within the occasion of divorce.
7. Submit-Nuptial Agreements
Submit-nuptial agreements, just like pre-nuptial agreements however established after marriage, supply a mechanism for {couples} to outline how belongings, together with trusts, are handled within the occasion of divorce. Whereas much less widespread than pre-nuptial agreements, post-nuptial agreements present a useful software for managing the complexities of marital property, particularly when trusts are concerned. They permit {couples} to switch the default guidelines of state regulation concerning asset division, offering readability and predictability. For example, a pair may set up a post-nuptial settlement after receiving a major inheritance, directing {that a} newly created belief to carry the inheritance stays separate property, even when managed collectively through the marriage. Conversely, a post-nuptial settlement may designate a belief funded with marital belongings as neighborhood property topic to equal division, no matter which partner established the belief.
Submit-nuptial agreements can handle a number of key points of trusts and marital property. These agreements can particularly categorize current or future trusts as separate or marital property, just like pre-nuptial agreements. Spouses may also waive rights or claims to one another’s trusts inside a post-nuptial settlement. That is notably related if one partner established a belief previous to the wedding and desires to make sure it stays separate property. Moreover, post-nuptial agreements can outline guidelines for commingling belongings inside a belief. For instance, an settlement may stipulate that contributions of marital funds to a pre-existing separate property belief convert a proportionate share of the belief into marital property. Lastly, as with pre-nuptial agreements, full disclosure of all belongings, together with trusts, is essential for a sound post-nuptial settlement. This transparency ensures each events are totally knowledgeable and may make sound choices concerning the settlement’s phrases. Take into account a situation the place a pair, after years of marriage, decides to determine a belief for the advantage of their youngsters. A post-nuptial settlement can specify that this belief, even when funded with marital belongings, stays separate property, defending it from division in a possible divorce.
Submit-nuptial agreements supply a strong means for managing the complicated interaction between trusts and marital property. They empower {couples} to outline their very own guidelines for asset division, offering readability and decreasing potential battle within the occasion of divorce. Nevertheless, the enforceability of post-nuptial agreements can range by jurisdiction, emphasizing the necessity for authorized counsel specializing in household regulation and property planning. Crafting a transparent and complete post-nuptial settlement, with full disclosure and consideration of the particular circumstances of the wedding and the character of any trusts concerned, is essential for making certain that the settlement successfully achieves its meant objective. Failure to fastidiously handle these points can result in unintended penalties and protracted authorized battles, undermining the advantages of creating a post-nuptial settlement within the first place.
8. Commingling of Property
Commingling of belongings considerably impacts whether or not a belief, or parts thereof, is deemed marital property throughout divorce proceedings. The act of blending separate property, akin to premarital belongings or inheritances, with marital property, like earnings earned through the marriage, inside a belief can blur the strains between what’s individually owned and what’s collectively owned. This blurring creates complexity when figuring out how belief belongings must be divided upon divorce. Understanding the implications of commingling is important for each spouses and property planners looking for to guard belongings and guarantee equitable outcomes.
-
Depositing Marital Funds right into a Separate Property Belief
When marital funds are deposited right into a belief initially funded with separate property, the commingling can remodel a portion of the belief into marital property. For instance, if one partner contributes a portion of their wage earned through the marriage right into a belief initially funded with an inheritance acquired earlier than the wedding, the portion of the belief attributable to the marital contributions, together with any related development, is likely to be deemed marital property topic to division. This holds true even when the contributing partner is the only trustee and beneficiary of the belief.
-
Utilizing Belief Funds for Marital Bills
Using funds from a separate property belief to pay for marital bills, akin to mortgage funds, family payments, or household holidays, can create commingling and probably expose a portion of the belief to division as marital property. Often utilizing belief funds to pay joint bills may lead a court docket to view the belief, no less than partially, as a marital useful resource, no matter its preliminary funding supply. For example, if a belief established with premarital funds is constantly used to pay household bills through the marriage, a portion of the belief is likely to be thought of marital property, reflecting its use for joint profit.
-
Titling Marital Property within the Identify of a Belief
Titling property acquired through the marriage, akin to a trip house or funding property, within the title of a belief, even one initially funded with separate property, doesn’t robotically protect the property from being labeled as marital property. The supply of funds used to accumulate the property and the aim of the belief shall be scrutinized. If marital funds or joint efforts had been used to accumulate or keep the property held inside the belief, it could possibly be thought of marital property whatever the belief construction.
-
Lack of Clear File-Holding
Sustaining meticulous data that clearly distinguish between separate and marital funds inside a belief is essential. With out clear documentation, tracing the supply of funds turns into difficult, and a court docket is likely to be extra inclined to categorise a bigger portion of the belief as marital property. Detailed data of contributions, distributions, and the aim of every transaction are important to display the separate nature of particular belongings inside the belief. Failure to keep up enough data can considerably weaken a celebration’s declare that sure belief belongings must be thought of separate property.
Commingling inside a belief creates important complexities when figuring out what constitutes marital property throughout divorce. The dearth of clear separation between separate and marital funds can result in disputes and probably inequitable outcomes. Cautious planning, meticulous record-keeping, and clear delineation of separate and marital property inside belief paperwork are important to mitigate the dangers related to commingling. Failing to deal with commingling proactively can considerably impression the division of belief belongings in divorce, probably undermining the very objective of creating the belief within the first place.
Steadily Requested Questions About Trusts and Marital Property
The intersection of trusts and divorce proceedings typically generates complicated questions. This part addresses widespread considerations and potential misconceptions concerning the therapy of trusts as marital property.
Query 1: Are trusts all the time shielded from division in divorce?
No, trusts aren’t all the time immune from division. Whereas trusts can supply a level of asset safety, their therapy in divorce hinges on numerous components, together with the timing of the belief’s creation, the supply of its funding, the jurisdiction, and the phrases of any pre- or post-nuptial agreements. A belief established and funded earlier than the wedding with separate property usually affords larger safety than a belief established through the marriage.
Query 2: Can a belief established throughout marriage defend belongings from division?
A belief established through the marriage can probably defend belongings underneath particular circumstances. For example, a belief created for the advantage of a 3rd occasion, akin to a toddler with particular wants, is likely to be protected, even when funded with marital belongings. Nevertheless, trusts established through the marriage and primarily benefiting the settlor partner is likely to be topic to division, particularly if funded with marital funds.
Query 3: Does titling belongings within the title of a belief robotically protect them in divorce?
Merely transferring belongings right into a belief doesn’t robotically protect them from division in divorce. Courts look at the substance of the association, together with the management exercised over the belief and the supply of the funds, slightly than solely the title. Transferring marital belongings right into a belief managed by one partner is unlikely to stop these belongings from being thought of marital property.
Query 4: How does commingling of belongings have an effect on a belief in divorce?
Commingling of separate and marital property inside a belief complicates asset division. Mixing funds can convert a portion of a separate property belief into marital property. Meticulous record-keeping is essential to hint the supply of funds and delineate separate versus marital belongings inside the belief. Failing to keep up clear data can result in a larger portion of the belief being deemed marital property.
Query 5: What position do pre- and post-nuptial agreements play regarding trusts?
Pre- and post-nuptial agreements present a strong software for outlining how trusts are dealt with in divorce. These agreements can explicitly categorize trusts as separate or marital property, waive rights to belief belongings, and set up guidelines for commingling. Addressing trusts proactively in these agreements gives readability and helps keep away from disputes throughout divorce.
Query 6: How can one guarantee a belief successfully protects belongings in divorce?
Guaranteeing a belief successfully protects belongings requires cautious planning and a spotlight to element. Consulting with authorized counsel specializing in each property planning and household regulation is essential. Methods embrace establishing the belief properly earlier than marriage, funding it with separate property, clearly defining its objective, limiting spousal management, and addressing the belief particularly inside pre- or post-nuptial agreements. Meticulous record-keeping can also be very important.
Understanding these basic rules helps people and {couples} navigate the complicated intersection of trusts and divorce. Consulting with skilled authorized counsel stays essential for creating personalised methods tailor-made to particular circumstances and jurisdictional necessities.
The next sections will present additional particulars concerning the particular varieties of trusts and the way they’re sometimes handled in divorce proceedings.
Ideas for Navigating Trusts and Divorce
Defending belongings and making certain equitable outcomes throughout divorce requires cautious consideration of trusts and their potential therapy as marital property. The following tips supply steering for people and {couples} navigating this complicated intersection of household regulation and property planning.
Tip 1: Search Professional Authorized Counsel Early
Consulting with attorneys specializing in each household regulation and belief administration is essential. Early engagement permits for proactive planning and knowledgeable decision-making concerning belief creation, funding, and administration, minimizing potential disputes throughout divorce proceedings.
Tip 2: Set up Clear Belief Provisions
Belief paperwork ought to clearly outline the aim of the belief, the supply of its funding, the powers of the trustee, and the rights of beneficiaries. Unambiguous language and well-defined provisions assist forestall misinterpretations and facilitate environment friendly asset division in divorce.
Tip 3: Preserve Meticulous Information
Detailed data of all belief transactions, together with contributions, distributions, and bills, are essential. These data present a transparent audit path and facilitate tracing the supply of funds, important for distinguishing between separate and marital property inside the belief.
Tip 4: Take into account Pre- or Submit-Nuptial Agreements
Pre- and post-nuptial agreements supply a useful software for outlining how trusts shall be handled in divorce. Explicitly addressing trusts inside these agreements gives readability and predictability, probably mitigating contentious disputes over asset division.
Tip 5: Perceive Jurisdictional Variations
State legal guidelines concerning marital property and trusts range considerably. Understanding the relevant jurisdiction’s guidelines is essential for creating efficient methods to guard belongings and obtain equitable outcomes throughout divorce.
Tip 6: Keep away from Commingling Property Every time Doable
Mixing separate and marital funds inside a belief can create complexities. Sustaining clear separation between separate and marital property simplifies asset division and helps protect the separate character of premarital belongings and inheritances.
Tip 7: Evaluate and Replace Belief Paperwork Often
Common assessment and updates of belief paperwork guarantee they align with present circumstances and authorized necessities. This ongoing upkeep helps protect the meant objective of the belief and minimizes potential challenges throughout divorce.
Implementing these methods gives people and {couples} with a powerful basis for navigating the complexities of trusts and divorce. Proactive planning, clear documentation, and knowledgeable authorized steering are essential for safeguarding belongings and attaining equitable outcomes.
In conclusion, understanding how trusts work together with marital property legal guidelines is important for each property planning and household regulation issues. The knowledge offered on this article gives a framework for approaching these complexities and highlights the significance of looking for skilled steering.
Conclusion
Whether or not trusts are thought of marital property hinges on a fancy interaction of things. Jurisdictional variations, the timing of belief creation and funding supply, the extent of spousal management, and the aim of the belief all contribute to this willpower. Pre- and post-nuptial agreements supply mechanisms for clarifying the therapy of trusts in divorce, offering useful instruments for asset safety and equitable distribution. Commingling of separate and marital belongings inside a belief introduces complexities, underscoring the significance of meticulous record-keeping and clear delineation of property possession.
Given the intricate authorized panorama surrounding trusts and divorce, looking for knowledgeable authorized counsel specializing in each property planning and household regulation is paramount. Proactive planning, clear documentation, and a radical understanding of related authorized rules are essential for navigating these complexities and attaining desired outcomes. Failure to deal with these points proactively can result in protracted authorized battles, jeopardizing monetary safety and undermining the meant objective of the belief. Cautious consideration of those components is important for safeguarding particular person pursuits and making certain equitable resolutions within the occasion of divorce.
